Jung & Naiv
Jung & Naiv

BERLINALE 2026: Unser Rückblick auf das historische Filmfestival + Kritiken

February 28, 2026 • 2h 12m

Summary

⏱️ 8 min read

Overview

This episode provides an in-depth review of the Berlinale film festival, where hosts Thilo and Kira were accredited as journalists. The discussion centers on their controversial questions during press conferences about selective solidarity, fascism, and Gaza, which sparked international debate. They examine the political tensions between artistic freedom and government funding, critique the festival's handling of political statements, and review several films from the competition. The episode culminates with Thilo receiving YouTube's Independent Journalism Award.

Introduction and Berlinale Context

The hosts return to discuss their fourth year covering the Berlinale, explaining their accreditation process and setting up what became the most eventful festival experience yet. They establish the Berlinale's identity as the most political of the major film festivals and its historical positioning as a window to the free world since its 1950 founding in West Berlin. This political legacy becomes crucial context for the controversies that follow.

  • This was their fourth year being accredited at the Berlinale
  • The Berlinale positions itself as the most political of the three major film festivals alongside Cannes and Venice
  • The festival is primarily funded by the German federal government through Culture Minister Wolfram Weimar

The Jury Press Conference and Wim Wenders' Controversial Response

Thilo asked the opening jury, which included Wim Wenders, about the festival's selective solidarity with Iran and Ukraine but not Palestine, given Germany's involvement in Gaza and role as main festival funder. Wenders' response that artists must stay out of politics sparked immediate international backlash, especially given his previous political statements. The livestream mysteriously cut out during the question, adding to the controversy.

  • Thilo asked the jury about selective solidarity - the Berlinale had supported Iran and Ukraine but never Palestine
  • The question referenced Germany's role in Gaza and as the Berlinale's main funder
  • Wim Wenders responded that artists must stay out of politics
  • The livestream broke during the question, leading to speculation about censorship
" We have to stay out of politics. We have to stay out of politics because when we make films that are politically engaged, then we are into politics, but we are the opposite of politics. We have to do the work of the people and not the work of politicians. "

📚 7 more sections below

Sign up to unlock the complete summary with all insights, key points, and quotes