TRIGGERnometry
TRIGGERnometry

Why I Exposed Anti-Trump Bias At The BBC

November 26, 2025 • 1h 5m

Summary

⏱️ 9 min read

Overview

David Seddon, a former BBC graphic designer who worked at Newsnight between 2022-2024, exposes how the BBC doctored footage of President Trump's January 6th speech not once, but twice. He reveals a pattern of institutional bias at the broadcaster, describing an insular culture where employees share similar backgrounds, politics, and worldviews. This whistleblower account provides rare insight into the BBC's editorial processes, the prevalence of groupthink, and how a lack of ideological diversity has eroded trust in what was once considered the gold standard of objective journalism.

The Trump Edit Scandal: How It Happened Twice

David reveals the shocking discovery that led him to contact The Telegraph: BBC's Newsnight had used a deceptively edited clip of Trump's January 6th speech in 2022, splicing together statements made 54 minutes apart to create a false narrative. When Panorama did the exact same thing in 2024, he realized this wasn't an isolated error but a pattern. The edit made it appear Trump told supporters to march to the Capitol and immediately said to "fight like hell," when in reality these statements were separated by nearly an hour of speech. Most troublingly, when called out live on air in 2022, the presenter said nothing, and the next day's editorial meeting dismissed it with "well it's gone now."

  • The Telegraph broke the Panorama story about doctored Trump footage, but David had seen this exact edit used before at Newsnight in 2022
  • The edit spliced together Trump saying "we're going to walk down to the Capitol" with "fight like hell" - statements made 54 minutes apart
  • A guest on the 2022 Newsnight show (identified as someone who had resigned from Trump's team) called out the deceptive edit live on air
  • Presenter Kirsty Wark offered no apology or acknowledgment when the manipulation was pointed out
  • At the next morning's editorial meeting, when a producer questioned how the clip went out, a senior staff member dismissed it saying "well it's gone now"
" I was aghast. I was thinking, how can they think that they get away with it? You're manipulating time to create a lie. And how can you do that twice? "
" It is election interference. That program, there are Americans who live in this country who have American nationality and they are allowed to vote. So anybody who saw that could say, well, that swung it for me. "

The BBC Bubble: Ideological Conformity and Groupthink

David describes an insular culture at the BBC where staff share remarkably similar backgrounds, worldviews, and sources of information. He recounts hearing a senior correspondent explain Trump and January 6th through the lens of QAnon conspiracy theories—information gleaned entirely from another BBC podcast rather than independent research. This self-referential ecosystem meant that truth was validated simply because "another BBC correspondent said it's true." The lack of ideological diversity created an environment where challenging the prevailing narrative became uncomfortable, and David found himself whispering with allies rather than speaking freely.

  • A correspondent tried to force Brexit into a story where it wasn't relevant, asking a producer "how can we work Brexit into the story?"
  • A senior correspondent attributed January 6th to QAnon based solely on hearing another BBC podcast, demonstrating the self-referential nature of their information ecosystem
  • Staff at the BBC exist in a "tiny ecosystem" getting their worldview validated by other BBC correspondents rather than diverse sources
  • David had to whisper with allies about his concerns, knowing who was on the left or right through their reactions to stories
" I'm looking at sources of YouTube and Twitter and stuff like that. And I'm seeing a completely different world than you are. And you're in this bubble. And so it's true because another BBC correspondent said it's true. It must be true. "
" There were conversations in the newsroom that made me think, hang on a minute, you know, I thought we were objective here. "

📚 6 more sections below

Sign up to unlock the complete summary with all insights, key points, and quotes